The
widow who was burnt on the funeral pyre of her dead husband is depicted in
Indian Brahmanical traditions and in popular English accounts. Sometime, it was
used as an adjective or a noun and means ‘that which is’ which exists, or that
which is ‘free’, more specific meanings can be derived such as ‘good’,
‘faithful’, ‘virtuous’ honest, or ideal wife who was linked with her husband in
a relationship of unshakeable devotion and subordination. The depictions of
this are found in Brahmanical mythology. The term Sati was not always used for widow burning on the funeral pyre of
her husband as the episodes of ‘Sati Parvati’,
‘Sati Sita Mata and ‘Sati Savatri’ etc. In early Indian
mythology the notion was portrayed in complete accordance with the ideal of Sati, but not a widow.
The feudal fashion of Agnisnan (fire-bath) of Rajputs widows
was widely prevailed among the Rajputs of Rajputana, the prevalence of this
feudal fashion among the warlike people is not difficult to understand. The fighting
races were very jealous and suspicious of their wives, they married the women
of subjugated enemies and turned them into wives, could not completely shed the
feeling of suspicion and disdain for them. The matrix seem to be considerably
responsible for shaping the traditional attitudes toward women. It was natural
for the victories kings/chiefs to be suspicious of their wives who were
subjugated and forcibly married them. Thus, the low assessment of women be
embedded in the very roots of the traditional Rajputs thoughts and social
structure. Therefore, the social position of widow shows a perceptible deadline
with the passage of time where the fidelity and loyalty of widow was doubted.
According to the popular belief in
feudal societies that “it was pious duty of the relatives of the dead man to
provide all the things that he usually needed when alive. Especially when an
important personage like a king, a nobleman or a warrior died, it was felt that
his usual paraphernalia should be ‘sent’ with him”.3 Such a belief
might have given rise to the custom of widow burning on the funeral pyre. The
popular belief in the hereafter indicates very clearly that it became the basis
for the burning of widow on the funeral pyre of her husband in Rajputana, although
our religious literacy traditions have very definite notion of the hereafter
but the fashion of taking Agnisnan
has never been a part of religion, and, infact, they opposed it my strongly.
Our religious tradition did not recommend and prescribed this feudal fashion of
‘fire-bath’.
However, everyone had the right to be
accompanied by others. But this possibility seldom materialized. This
limitation helps prevent the self-destruction of society and at the some
time ensures that the custom retained it
egalitarian nature.4 Only certain categories of people like Rajputs
followed the fashion of fire-bath-and pained death, where social inequality
become the second necessary precondition of this feudal fashion of agnisnan. Another circumstances behind
the burning of widow on her husband funeral pyre might be the intention of
relatives to get rid of her, to appropriate her wealth and save the cost of her
upkeep. The certain condition, especially developed structures of inequality
where women were compared with dog, Sudras
and the blackbird, because they are untruth.5 Thus, it seems that
the social status of woman was reduced to the level of an animal in feudal
society of Rajputana. Among Rajputs Satis
were idealized as Devi (deity) placed
on a high pedestal, and worshiped, but worshiping is one question and giving
freedom to widow is quite another. For example we do worship cow, but we do not
leave it free.
The widow who willingly burnt (or took
fire bath) on the funeral pyre of her husband, might be victim of various
compulsions. Often what was in store for her was a life of poverty and misery,
devoid of all social contact, and or being regarded as a lesser being6
(bracked with Sudras and animals).
Her decision to burn on the pyre was taken immediately after the death of her
husband – taken therefore in a state of shock and in a fit of deep depression.
Generally her relatives and priests would direct her to do it. She was grown up
in a society in which socialization was based on the subordination of women to
men. Could one speak of free choice in a feudal society or a strong patriarchal
society like Rajput? Thus the widow in Rajput feudal society was the victim of
social and economic constraints and she was the victim of perpetual structural
violence.
The Vedic literary traditions do not recommend agnisnan or fire-bath (so called sati) as an act to be practiced,
although we find a reference to this custom in Vedic traditions.7 But these traditions do not subscribe the custom of widow burning the
appears the feudal fashion as early as 400
B.C., but did not get religious
sanction till medieval times. Even Kautilya does not mention this custom
in Arthasastra, Manu, compares this
for custom to as suicide and condemns the act as a form of suicide which would
consign the perpetrators soul to hell.8 The Mahabharta and Ramayana
refer the custom of widow-burning. But
it is quite clear that it is due to the anachronism of its compilers. The Mahabharta itself made it clear that all
the widows of the fallen heroes remained behind and offered them funeral
oblations.9 In the original portion of the Ramayana10 there is no case of Sati. In the Uttarakanda, we find Vedavatis mother
becoming a Sati, but this story is
more legendary than historical, and seems to be a later addition. Despite
growing support to widow burning there was a strong tradition of opposition to
this feudal fashion. Banabhatta in his work Kadambari,11
condemned the fashion of fire-bath as inhuman and called it a foolish mistake
of stupendous magnitude, committed under the reckless impulse of despair and
infatuation. However, the textual references to this custom of widow burning
have been quoted and misquoted time and again with regards to the custom of
Sati. Now historians and sociologists begun to took more broadly at the
socio-cultural environment that created it. The early Indian textual origin of
this, fashion of fire-bath on her husband funeral pyre is confused and difficult
to pinpoint exactly, so the social and cultural forces that lead to the adoption
of the custom are obscure and a matter mainly of confecture.12 Most
of the information that we have on social customs in early India has been glared
from secular and religious traditions
are far from providing us with any unproblematic explanations of the root cause
of the this feudal fashion of widow burning.
The approach in traditional
historiography of Sati is textual and it almost ignored epigraphical
traditions. The scholars who wrote about widow burning are confined to the texual
traditions in order to cleanse it of its andocentric biases. Since, this brief paper is mainly based on epigraphic
traditions. The main argument is that the women presented in literary
traditions mostly emerge from an andocentric perspective and therefore, are
rarely real women. In contrast, those figuring in epigraphic traditions are
real women in flesh and blood.”13 The women in epigraphic traditions
are closer to historical reality than the idealized women of literary
traditions.
Memorial stones were erected for the
widows, although among Hindu memorial monuments were rarely erected to the
dead, this was conspicuous. The memorial stones displayed special visual
elements. The most common was the raised right arms with a Lemon held in the
hand; the bangles, symbolizing the married women, were shown on the arms. Some
times the stone show the figure of a woman, often accompanied by that of a man,
but such portrayals are occasionally accompanied by inscriptions.14
The
earliest historical reference to widow burning or taking fire bath on
the funeral pyre of her husband was referred by Diodorus in his account. Many
scholars referred this custom of widow burning in their respective writing very
briefly. The wife of Hindu general Keteus, who died in 316 B.C., while fighting
against Antigonons. Diodorus siculus said:” she was set upon the pyre by her
own brother and was regarded with wonder by the crowd that had run together to
the spectacle, and heroically ended her life, the whole force with their arms
thrice marching round the pyre before it was kindled.15 The Greek
historians made it clear that the custom was confined to the Kathians of
Punjab.16
The
earliest epigraphic evidence of widow burning is recorded in Earn Stone Pillar Inscription of Bhanagupta 510
A.D., in the Sagar district of Madhya Pradesh. “The wife of general
Goparaja, one of the army commanders of Bhanagupta died at this place in battle
while fighting for his country against Huna, his wife immolated herself on her
husband’s funeral pyre.
“Hither
came Bhanu Gupta, the bravest man on earth,
a great king, a
hero bold as Arjana;
and hither Goporaja followed him, as a friend follows a
friend. And he fought a great and famous battle,
and passed to
heaven, a God among chieftains.
His wife, loyal
and loving, beloved and fair,
followed close
behind him into the flames”.17
The custom of widow-burning (agnisnan) was found in another inscription
of Madhya Pradesh which does not have a date, but can be ascribed to the a
second century A.D.18 D.D. Kosami is of the view that “the widow of
a warrior among the Madra and Bahlika clans would even immolate herself with
her husband’s corpse, and this horrifying custom was well known in feudal time”19
A large number of Sati memorials stones found all over Rajputana, but they have not
been studied systematically as yet. Therefore, it is very difficult to any
thing in precision regarding the frequency and the regional variation of the
custom of Agnisnan or finebath. Many
of the memorial Sati stones merely
speak of the death of an individual. But, in some cases an individual wife or wives burnt themselves on husband
funeral pyre as is recorded in Chhoti
Khata Sati Memorial Inscriptions of A.D. 686 A.D. 688 A.D., 692 A.D. and 770 A.D,20 where
the custom of fire-burning of four widows of four persons are commemorated
separately. Similar, memorial stones are found at Osian Jodhpur 838 A.D.,
contained the figure of a standing male. This figure is relieved within a niche
at the top of the pillar and bears close resemblance to an image found in religious edifices. The
top contains a carving of an amalaka
and a kumbhi. The inscription engraved
on the lower portion of the ventricle slabs or square pillars of the memorial.21
Another, Sati memorial (devlis)
are found in the desert area of western Rajasthan where the wives of the
warrior, who burnt-themselves, are carved near their husband figure.22
The
Balaknath Temple Parmar Memorial Inscription
of 1013 A.D., records the fire-bath taken by Meehimadevi wife of Dhedhok
Rajput Chief.23 An inscription of 1023 A.D. refers the burning of
Rani Sampika on the funeral pyre of her husband,24 similar act of
widow burning is referred in an inscription of 1027 A.D.25 A Sati
memorial inscription tells us about the widow burning in 1134 A.D.,26
and the similar act of widow burning in Jodhpur region in the year 1143 A.D. is
recorded.27 The pillar inscription of 1126, refers the act of agnisnan (fire-bath)28 of
three Rajput womens such as Salekhadevi Chauhan, Sawaladevi Solikanee and
Saijandevi wives Rathor king Salakharao. This show that among the ruling
families of Rajputana the custom or feudal fashion of agnisnan or fire-bath on the pyre of the dead husband was firmly established
by the eleventh and twelfth centuries A.D., became a historical fact by that
time. The average Rajputs widow welcomed the opportunity to take agnisnan. A Sati memorial inscription of 1160 A.D.,29 reveals us
the act of fire-bath or fire-burning by the two widows of Guhila Chief on his funeral
pyre. Similarly, the lohari inscription
of 1179 A.D.,30 refers the act of (agnisnan) fire-bath by nine widows of Jalsala on his pyre. An identical
act of widow burning of Ajaypala three wives, Somaladevi, Osthalada and Sridevi,
at Bassi, in 1132 is recorded.31 A records from Jaismlair depicts
the Sangli widow of Chauhan Chief Kusara burnt herself on the funeral pyre of
her husband in the year 1174 A.D.32 It seems that Rajputana was the
strong hold of widow burning. Most of the act of widow burning can be recorded
in early medieval Rajasthan among the ruling class of that region. Since, most
of the Rajput clans trace their ancestry to the noble and the high military
officers of the various invaders who came into Rajputana and founded kingdom or
fiefs in early medieval times.
The
Goth-Manglod Inscription of 1175 A.D.,33 refers the act of
fire-bath of Tribhuvan devi on the pyre of her busband, in similar feudal fashion
three widows of Guhila Rana Thaihanpal burnt themselves on the pyre of their
husband in 1180 A.D.34 Another memorial inscription of 1187 A.D.,35
from Jodhpur refers the act of a Sati
in similar feudal fashion. Another inscription of 1188 A.D.,36
reveals us that Mata Goheilnee Veesaldevi too followed the fashion of agnisnan on the pyre of her Chauhan
husband. Usatra memorial inscription 1192
A.D.,37 from Jodhpur region, refers the death of Guhilota Rama
Motishwera and his queen widow Rajee burnt herself on his pyre, the similar act
of fire-bath is referred in inscription of 1191 A.D.38 Thus the
study of Rajputs memorial inscriptions show us that the this feudal fashion of
widow burning among the Rajputs was widespread and glaring. Since, Rajputs were
considered aggressive community expected more fidelity and loyalty from their
women servants and other.
The
Sati memorial Inscription 1192 A.D.,39 records the fire-bath of
Sonaldevi on the pyre of her husband Nalha. Kainasarya
Sati memorial pillor inscription 1243,40 refers the fire-bath
taken by Rani Neeladevi on the funeral pyre of her husband. Another inscription
of 1273 A.D.,41 records the death of Rathor Rao Sighajee and his
wife Rani Parvati followed him to next world by burning herself on the funeral
pyre of Sighajee.
Thus, it is very clear from the study
of Rajput memorial inscriptions that, the military virtues of fearlessness and
valour came to be highly valued in feudal Rajputs society; in
addition,42
so called honour had always been an overriding notion in feudal society. In
feudal society a glorious death was to be welcomed for Rajputs in battle field,
and for women, in a fiery end through the feudal fashion of fire-bath (agnisnan) If death rather than defeat
and dishonour, was the motto for the Rajputs, death rather than disgrace and
dishonour through ravishment, was its equivalent for the women.
In Rajputana, court bards prepared the
psychological ground for widow burning or fire-bath by providing the suitable
ideological rationale making this feudal fashion of fire-bath a strong feudal
model for women chastity, fidelity and loyalty connecting it with pativratadharma This feudal custom of
widow-burning into a heroic sacrifice and effectively linked it to the honour
and prestige of a woman’s natal and conjugal clans. But it is very clear that
this feudal fashion of widow-burning was not the monopoly of Rajputs only, it
was prevalent among others. They also adopted and copied the feudal fashion
culture and various practices of Rajputs. The feudal fashion of widow burning
or agnisnan, or fire-bath was
peculiar to early Rajputs society. It seem that they were burnt on the funeral
pyre of their husband either under
social pressure or because of their entrenched belief in the eternal and
exclusive loyalty and fidelity to their husband. It shows that the feudal
fashion of fire-bath was common in the feudal phase in Rajaputana and got
social legitimatization. Since, the early medieval period of Rajputs was marked
by constant military activity, because of the physical dominance of men became
all powerful.
Women are indispensable for the
continuation of society; they have the unique power of giving birth. But this
realization received less and less emphasis among the early medieval Rajputs
society, so much so that women, widows in particular, ultimately came to be
treated as a liability rather than a precious asset. The importance of women in
this regards was thus obviously, and perhaps intentionally underrated and
subjugated to the level of non-being.
References
1. Jong Fisch, Immolating Women A Global History of Widow
Burning from Ancient to the Present. (Tr.) from the German by Rekha Kamath
Rajan, Delhi , 2005, p. 214 (hereafter Jorg Fisch)
Ramayana of Valmiki, (ed) by U.P.
Shah, Oriental Institute, Baroda ,
1962-75.6.103.17-6. 104.26. 6.103.17-20, 6.104.24.
2. C.W. Thomas, Ashes of Immortality Widow-Burning in India,
(tr.) by Jeffrey Mehlman and Daniel Gordon Write, Delhi , 2000, p.43. E.W. Burtingame, “The Act
of Truth: A Hindu Spell and its Employment as a Psychic Motif in Hindu
Fiction”, Journal of royal Asiatic Society ,
England , 1917, pp. 429-67.
3. A.S. Altekar, The Position of Women in Hindu Civilization,
Delhi , rep.
1983. pp. 116-17.
4. Jorg Fisch, op. cit., pp. 10-11.
5. G.D. Upadhaya, Satpatha Brahmana, Delhi , 1967-69, XIV. 1.1.31.
6. Jorg Fisch, op. cit., p.16.
7. H.H. Wilson
(tr.) The Rgvedic Samhita, Delhi , 1977; X, 18,7.
Atharuveda, (tr.) Devi Chand, Delhi , 1982, XVIII, 3, 13.
2.1.3.
8. Jawala Prasad, Manusmrati, Bombay 1963, V. 157, 160-162, Yajnanalkya Smriti, (ed.) Naragana
Sastri, Varanasi, 1930, 1.75.
9. Mahabharta, (tr.) D. Satwalekor Pardi,
Gorkhpur, 1971-74, IV, 23,4. Adiparva XVII, 7.1 8-24.
10. Ramayana, 17,14.
11. Nir (ed) Kadambri, Bombay , 1910, Purvardha, p. 308. Andrea Major, (ed) SATI A Historical Anthology, Delhi ,
2007 p. xxi.
12. Andrea major, op.cit., p. XXII.
13. K.K. Shah, The Problem of Identity: Women in Early
Indian Inscriptions, Delhi ,
2001, p. VII.
14. S. Settar, Inviting death Indian Attitude towards the
ritual death, Leiden, 1989, pp. 148-59, Jong Fisch, op. cit., p. 227.
15. Sakuntala
Narasimhan, Sati A Study of widow Burning
in India, Delhi, 1998, p. 138, Andrea Major, op. cit., p. XIX, Jong Fish, op. cit., p. 224.
16. Sakuntala Rao, “Suttee” in Annals of the Bhardarkar Oriental research Institute, Bombay , p. 222. A.S.
Altekar, the position of women, op. cit.,
p. 123, R.S. Sharma, Perspective in
Social and Economic History of Early India, Delhi, 2005, rep. p. 95.
17. B.C. Chhabra G.S.
Gai (eds) Corpus Inscriptionun Indicarum,
Vol. III, Delhi ,
1981 No. 43, pp. 352-53. J.F. Fleet, Corpus
Inscriptionum Indicarum, Leiden, Vol. III, 1988, p. 93, A.L. Basham, Wonder that was India, Delhi, Rep. 1994,
p. 189. Jong Fisch, op. cit., p. 226.
Sakuntala Narasimhan, Sati, op. Cit.,
p. 164.
18. Archaeological Survey of India , Vol.
VII, 1978, pp. 136-37. D.C. Sircar, Sati,
A Mythological Story, Calcutta ,
1916, pp. 210-15.
19. D.D. Kasambi, the Culture and Civilization of Ancient
Indian Historical Outline, Bombay ,
1970, p. Shankuntala Narasimhan, Sati, op.cit., p. 167.
20. Govind Srimali, Rajsthan Kai Abhilekhs, Jodhpur , 2000, p. 78. S.
Settar and G.D. Sontheimer, (eds) Memorial
Stones, Delhi ,
1982, p. 142.
21. R.C. Agrawala in
S.Settar and G.D. Sontheimer (eds) Memorial
Stones, “Govardhana Pilliars from
Rajsthan an Iconographic Study”, p. 151. Govind Srimali, op.
cit., pp. 14-15.
22. Goetz, H., “Rajput Reliefs”. Oriental Art X(3) London , 1964, pp. 167-168.
D. Sharma, Early Chauhan Dynasties, Delhi , 1959, pp. 257-58.
R.S. Sharma, Perspectives in Social and Economic,
op.cit., p. 96.
23. Govind Srimali, op. cit., p. 59.
24. Ibid., p.61.
25. Ibid.
26. Govind Srimali, op. cit., p. 100. Anita Sudan, A Study of Chauhan Inscriptions of Rajasthan,
Jodhpur , 1989,
pp. 195-96.
27. Govind Srimali, op.cit., p. 107.
28. Ibid, pp. 132-33. Sakuntala Rao, Loc. Cit., p. 333.
29. Govind Srimali, op.cit., p. 134.
30. B.D.
Chattopadhyaya in S. Setters G.D. Sonthcimer (eds) Memorial Stone, op.cit., p. 142.
31. Epigraphica Indica, Archaeological Survey of India ,
Delhi , 1965,
1981, XXXVII, pp. 163-64.
32. Govind Srimali op. cit., p. 167.
33. Ibid., p.171.
34. Ibid., p. 183. R.S. Sharma, Perspectives
of Social, op.cit., p.99.
35. Govind Srimali, op.cit., p. 195.
36. Ibid.
37. Ibid., p. 199.
38. Ibid.
39. Ibid., p. 200.
40. Ibid, p. 216, EI, XII, No. 12 p. 58.
41. Govind Srimali, op. cit., p. 235.
42. Romila, Thapar, In History in Symposium on Sati,
Seminar, Vol. 342, Feb. 1988, Andrea Major, (ed), Sati op. cit., p. XXVI-XXVII.
wah!!!!!!!!!! what a site... hats off to admin... really learned so much from this post...... from hanuman chalisa
ReplyDeleteOnline casino site - Lucky Club Live
ReplyDeleteLuckyClub is one of luckyclub the top online casino in Malaysia. The site is an online gambling site operated by Playtech, a company based in Singapore, How to Play Online · How to Play Online · PayPal · How to Register